Firefox versions why so many

Yes, but to be sure, you should remove all of them. Then get the full installer. Then Close Firefox. Using your file browser, open the Programs Folder on your computer. Do Not remove any profile folders. FredMcD Top 10 Contributor. Flash Player Version: Version Flash Player Version: '''Version Chosen Solution Belana9 said Can i safely delete the old versions?

Then '''Close Firefox. See the Content blocking Enhanced Tracking Protection article for details. If Adobe's Flash Player plugin is installed, rendering Flash content in full screen can be accelerated by hardware. This can ease resource usage in case of a dedicated graphics card. Each tab requires Firefox to store a web page in memory. If you frequently have more than tabs open , consider using a more lightweight mechanism to keep track of pages to read and things to do, such as:.

Firefox hardware acceleration eases memory and CPU usage in many cases. Check in Firefox's performance settings that hardware acceleration is turned on. Also make sure that your graphics drivers are up-to-date. With Multiprocess Firefox , also called electrolysis or e10s , Firefox runs web content for all tabs separately from the main Firefox process for increased security and performance. Using multiple content processes can further increase performance and minimize the impact of content process crashes.

You can modify Firefox's performance settings to change the content process limit. You can set between one and eight content processes. The default is eight. Having more content processes can improve performance when using multiple tabs but it will also use more memory. You can reduce the number of content processes if your computer is running out of memory.

Having many applications running simultaneously may cause your computer to run slowly and other applications to do so as well.

By closing down some of the unnecessary applications, system usage will be reduced. Firefox stores your data in various files in your profile folder. The file used for saving individual website settings might be corrupt. If you delete or rename that file, your zoom level settings will be reset but it could decrease CPU usage. The Refresh Firefox feature can fix many issues by restoring your Firefox profile to its default state while saving your essential information.

See Refresh Firefox - reset add-ons and settings for details. Then there is WebGL were many a problem has arisen with graphic card drivers and them having to eventually resort to banning some graphics card from being used with WebGL. And I would guess some of the other technologies have faced simpler issues I just haven't looked into them as much. If I am not mistaken all the major browsers are on an accelerated release schedules to get all these new technologies implemented. And beyond the technologies in that list there are others they don't even mention, like WebCL and possibly others.

I would fully expect the accelerated release schedule to continue for the foreseeable future. But when they get through implementing all these new technologies the face of the internet will have been drastically changed, and arguably for the better. Kriknos ,you are the first person to actually attempt to answer the question, and for that I deeply thank you. People like cor-el and the-edmeister seem to think 'shut up and use it' is an answer, and it really isn't.

That said, is it really necessary to force every single user to serve as an unwilling beta-tester for every two-bit patch? Some people just want to surf the web, without having to manually update their browser every few weeks. Large companies have a testing process they have to go through before distributing an upgrade to what might be hundreds or thousands of computers.

A new release cycle the same length as their testing process is little more than an argument for scrapping firefox. If the goal is to make firefox a browser developed by developers, for developers, with no interest in having a user base, firefox is doing it about perfect.

If they really want a user base, even a little, the developers need to look outside their Ivory Tower. I quit using firefox for several versions once upon a time, and survived; I can do it again. If FireFox is going to be putting a new major version out every month and a half, why do they even show the version point numbers? Every release is going to be 'n. The system seems to think I am still part of the beta release channel, but I've done my damnedest to get off it.

Done that, but as noted, it's not enough. To be crystal clear: tell me how to get completely off the beta release channel. Let me pose a very blunt, hypothetical question: what is the upside of developing the most up-to-date which is an ephemeral notion, at best , robust, feature-packed application No auto-upgrade means inconvenienced, disgruntled users.

Rapidly changing versions means confused users. Lack of support means users grasping for help or, sooner or later, for a viable and less disruptive alternative. Does any of this sound good to you? I've been a Firefox user almost since it first came out. I like it. It's open source and conforms to standards as well as anything out there. Excuse me AND the problem is with Firefox! Now the stampede to have a new higher major version number every x weeks is just plain daft and the point releases shortly thereafter merely point at insufficient testing of code.

How about getting a sensible version system, say 12 for the year and a point release each month? A system where you can instantly tell when it was updated, ie.

I still use 3. Some of the addons I find essential to online life are not compatible with FF 5, 6, 7, 9, etc. Usually a major version is released for a MAJOR change to the program, not that we added a cool new feature! Your current release mechanism is daft in the extreme, as pointed out in the proceeding posts to this.

Simply saying upgrade is not really an option unless you wish to alienate the loyal user base that made you what you are! There are discussions to move Firefox from a x. However, none of those discussions have reached fruition yet. This version received security and stability updates, but not new features updates, for a year. So, instead of going from 8 to 9 to 10, this version goes like this Until next year, when it will receive an update to what will probably be Firefo 17, when it begins the process again.

It isn't really recommended for most users, but if you need more stability in your version numbers, I would switch to the ESR. I would try giving it a go. Firefox 3. It makes it look like Firefox has no development roadmap.